While challenging and down to earth about how the quality of future life on the planet is at risk due to climate change, the Stern Review’s prescription of what needs to be done is fundamentally flawed. It makes assertions that the climate can be stabilised; attaches a monetary value to carbon dioxide emissions that it claims will adequately cover the damage they cause, and implies that this value can take account of all the costs over at least the next 100 years. It can’t. Continue reading
Category Archives: Climate change
Review: How We Can Save the Planet
By Ian Roberts
Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
I read How We Can Save the Planet on a beach in Crete. It slapped me across the face with the reality of climate change. I felt embarrassed that I knew so little about the most important crisis facing humanity and was ashamed at the realisation that my personal carbon profligacy was part of the problem. Continue reading
21: Personal carbon allowances
In the past few years, the scientific community has achieved a near-consensus that our energy profligate lifestyles are contributing to a process that threatens future life on earth. As Robin Stott describes [1] the Global Commons Institute has put forward the only realistic framework to prevent this. Based on principles of precaution and equity, the policy of contraction and convergence is already commanding impressive national and international support [2]. Continue reading
What is sustainable growth?
Keynote speech for the 17th Annual TRICS Conference on Achieving Sustainable Growth, Regents Park Marriott Hotel, London, 1-2 November 2005.
A realistic future for any aspect of policy cannot be determined without reference to key factors that could substantially limit or enlarge its scope. The future role of transport is an obvious case in point. Consider the implications of the one key factor that is now being widely recognised as the most pressing issue of our time – indeed of any time! Continue reading
Carbon rationing to limit climate change: the most effective way of promoting cycling
Theme 01 – Cycling in the Wider Context
We are at a defining moment in history. Climate change is now becoming widely recognised as the most awesome threat ever faced by mankind. Accumulating evidence indicates that the choices and quality of life of future generations will be gravely affected as a direct outcome of our excessive use of fossil fuels. This is deeply embedded in all aspects of our lives. It is imperative that we face up to our responsibilities as current stewards of a planet with only a finite capacity to safely absorb the consequent greenhouse gas emissions. We must drastically and urgently curtail our energy-based activities in order to limit the damage that is already underway. Continue reading
As if there’s no tomorrow: why we must curb our energy-profligate lifestyles
Few readers of this article are likely to deny that we have an overriding responsibility to act as the current ‘stewards’ of the planet so that, as far as possible, the quality of life of people living after us is enhanced rather than diminished as a result of the lives we are leading. Indeed, most of us will express support for social justice and the need for people to be inspired by moral purpose and to act in the manner that does not prejudice the public interest. However, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. To what extent are we really prepared to alter our behaviour when our convictions have to be put to the test? Continue reading
Only one way: the ethical implications of climate change for personal lifestyles
What I have to say is largely drawn from my research and from reflections on its findings. The principal theme is that you cannot simply deal with each area of public policy in isolation in view of its scope for furthering or interfering with the success or failure of policy objectives in other areas. And you cannot ignore moral and ethical considerations. Optimal and sustainable solutions can only be derived from a holistic approach – which we ignore at our peril. Continue reading
Carbon budget watchers
The first article in this special issue on Climate Change has indicated that if the world’s climate is not to be seriously destabilised, its population’s average annual per capita emissions of carbon dioxide from all its direct and indirect fossil fuel-using activities must not exceed one tonne. Other articles in the issue provide evidence of awesome social, economic and environmental consequences in the event of failure. The UK current average is about ten tonnes. Earlier this year, Derek Osborn, Chairman of UNED-UK, stated “… we shall all have to learn again how to simplify lifestyles so that we consume less (my italics) energy in our homes, our work, our transport and our leisure”. He was clearly under-playing the gravity of the situation! Standing in the way of delivering the 90% reduction is the near-universal wish to raise our material standards of living by promoting economic growth, much of it dependent on use of fossil fuels and therefore leading to the production of excessive emissions. Continue reading
Climate change at the top of the political agenda
Research over the last ten years has revealed beyond reasonable doubt that the planet has a limited carrying capacity for greenhouse gas emissions if serious destabilisation of its climate from human activity is to be prevented. In light of this, there must be a substantial reduction of these emissions if the welfare of a significant proportion of the world’s present and future populations is to be protected. Continue reading
Terminal 5 Inquiry: The implications of climate change for the future of air travel
Written statement by Mayer Hillman for the Terminal 5 Inquiry. Published by Government of London, April 1998.
Dr. Hillman is a graduate of University College London, and of the University of Edinburgh. He is Senior Fellow Emeritus of the Policy Studies Institute – Britain’s leading independent research organisation in the economic and social policy fields – where he was engaged from 1970 to 1991 as the Head of the Institute’s Environment and Quality of Life Research Programme. His studies have been concerned with transport, urban planning, health promotion, and energy conservation and environment policies. He has written extensively on these subjects. Continue reading